What does it mean for an initiative to be “Not Viable” in agile analysis?

When an initiative is considered "Not Viable" in agile analysis, it indicates that the initiative is not meeting the expected outcomes. This could mean that the functionality being delivered does not resonate with the needs of the stakeholders or does not achieve the desired results that were initially intended. In agile environments, viability is assessed continuously, and if an initiative fails to produce value or achieve its goals, it is marked as not viable.

This principle is rooted in the agile focus on delivering value and maintaining a customer-centric approach. Teams are encouraged to regularly review their work, assess performance against expected outcomes, and pivot or discontinue efforts that are not yielding the intended benefits.

In contrast, the other options imply different conditions. Some suggest that an initiative has not been beneficial in the past or that it might be revisited in the future, neither of which directly aligns with the core tenet of immediate viability in agile analysis. Additionally, requiring more funding could apply to projects needing more resources, but it does not inherently imply that the project is not viable on its own merits. Therefore, the central idea is that if an initiative is not aligning with expected outcomes, it is primarily considered "Not Viable."