What should the analyst generally do after receiving significant change feedback from end-users?

The most suitable action for an analyst after receiving significant change feedback from end-users is to work with business representatives to reprioritize the backlog. This response acknowledges the dynamic nature of Agile environments, where stakeholder feedback is essential for ensuring that the development process aligns with user needs and priorities.

Facilitating a workshop with end users, while valuable for gathering more input, may not be the most effective immediate response to significant feedback. Instead, it can lead to further delays without addressing the need to adapt current priorities based on the input received.

Taking direction from a decision-maker may limit the analyst's ability to advocate for the user perspective and may not reflect the collaborative ethos that Agile practices promote. This option might lead to potential misalignments between end-user needs and the objectives set by decision-makers.

Not making any significant changes until the next few product increments are delivered can hinder the responsiveness that Agile teams aim to achieve. Ignoring valuable feedback can leave critical issues unaddressed, ultimately impacting user satisfaction and product success.

In summary, prioritizing the backlog, guided by user feedback, ensures that the team remains aligned with user expectations, encourages iterative improvements, and maintains a flexible response to change, which are foundational principles of Agile methodology.